Crichton, M. (1990). Jurassic Park. New York, NY. Alfred A. Knopf.
ISBN: 0-394-58816-9
Synopsis: Paleontologist Alan Grant and his paleobotanist
graduate student Ellie Sattler, along with a consulting team made up of a
cynical mathematician and a lawyer are invited by billionare and CEO of
International Genetic Technologies or InGen to his private island off the coast
of Costa Rica to visit and experience a new “biological preserve”. The team
soon discovers the wonders of this mysterious island, but due to catastrophic
circumstances and a bad storm they find themselves trying to simply survive the
night, let alone avoid a global disaster.
Characteristics of
Thriller:
·
Fast Pace
The entire 400 page book covers the span of a short twenty four hours, with a few short chapters in the beginning a couple days prior to set up the scenario. From there, it’s non-stop action and suspense. (I’ve seen the movie so I kinda knew what was going to happen, but it was still a page-turner)
The entire 400 page book covers the span of a short twenty four hours, with a few short chapters in the beginning a couple days prior to set up the scenario. From there, it’s non-stop action and suspense. (I’ve seen the movie so I kinda knew what was going to happen, but it was still a page-turner)
·
Extreme
detail and technical language
The scientific detail is impressive. I’m not sure what lengths of research Crichton did to create such believable geneticists, paleontologists, not to mention the mathematical theories (Chaos theory) and computer coding in this book. That being said, there are pages and pages of details, graphs, and charts strewn throughout the text. Some of the science is surely fictional given that these scientists can clone dinosaurs, but the theory in essence likely came from legitimate scientific research on genetics and cloning. It wasn’t too technical; as a reader who knew practically nothing on any of these topics, I could follow along.
The scientific detail is impressive. I’m not sure what lengths of research Crichton did to create such believable geneticists, paleontologists, not to mention the mathematical theories (Chaos theory) and computer coding in this book. That being said, there are pages and pages of details, graphs, and charts strewn throughout the text. Some of the science is surely fictional given that these scientists can clone dinosaurs, but the theory in essence likely came from legitimate scientific research on genetics and cloning. It wasn’t too technical; as a reader who knew practically nothing on any of these topics, I could follow along.
·
National/International
ramifications Dinosaurs. Smart, fast, lethal, carnivorous dinosaurs that
somehow are breeding when they aren’t supposed to, getting loose and might have
even found a way off the island? Yes, I think that would justify an
international crisis.
·
Strong,
loner-type protagonists
The main characters in this book, Alan
Grant (paleontologist), Ian Malcolm (Mathematician) and Timmy (child) fit
this description pretty well. Not much is known about Malcolm and his cynical, “I told you so” personality makes him
pretty unlikeable to most of the gang except for Grant and Timmy, who are the
other intelligent main characters. Grant,
with the most expertise on dinosaurs is definitely the loner-type who would
rather be out digging for fossils than teaching classes at a university, which
he only does the bare minimum for. Timmy
is a dino-obsessed kid who would rather read books than play sports. He’s able
to keep up with the adults and is smart enough to protect his sister. It’s almost hard to believe how calm this kid
gets when facing a Velociraptor or a T-Rex.
·
Weak
secondary characters
These are most of the people that die. A few of these secondary characters are
likeable, and some make it out alive with a few scratches. Others are not so
lucky, and quite frankly, most of them are so annoying that they deserve their
fate. A common situation for these secondary characters is that there is only
one person who knows how to do a particular thing, who ends up going missing,
leaving all the other weak secondary characters to stand around being clueless.
One secondary character who is an exception to this rule is Ellie Sattler,
who is almost a main character but doesn’t get enough page-time as the three
male main characters above. She’s brave, smart, and puts up with a lot of sexist
comments from all the male characters in the book (except Grant, who already
knows she’s awesome). Unfortunately she spends most of the book taking care of
wounded people and doesn’t get to say a lot. When she is given the opportunity
to take action (after insisting that she do so despite male protests), she is
marvelous.
·
Dark tone
The secrecy, illegal, unethical genetic research and shady business
transactions that happen with InGen and other genetic companies the book
describes create a very dark tone.
·
Focus on
a profession
The main focus is on the Genetics and Science profession, however, this
book does highlight several professions, including Paleontology, Mathematics,
and Computer Science.
Read A Likes:
Relic by Douglas
J. Preston
Fragment by Warren
Fahy
The Great Zoo of China
by Matthew Reilly
Chimera by Mira
Grant
Utopia by Lincoln
Child
Saricks, J. G. (2009). The Reader's Advisory Guide to Genre Fiction. Chicago, IL. American Library Association.
Saricks, J. G. (2009). The Reader's Advisory Guide to Genre Fiction. Chicago, IL. American Library Association.
Hi Shelby!
ReplyDeleteI have a bad habit of not reading (or watching :o) 'classics'. I do not even know why! I just stay away from them. It seems like Jurassic Park is a classic movie and book that I have not read. It was still interesting to see this well-known story dissected for its thriller elements. Did it make you appreciate the book more by doing this?
Darcy,
ReplyDeleteI definitely had fun dissecting the book! This class gave me an excuse to read it since this is hardly the kind of book I would normally pick up. I have been wanting to read Jurassic Park after seeing all of the movies last year for the first time, but I was also being a chicken at the same time. I hate gorey stuff, and the book definitely grossed me out more than the movies did, believe it or not. The movies are pretty tasteful with the gore. That aside, I loved the book and I appreciated it more since I had seen the movies and got to compare. I was impressed that the movie included a lot of stuff that I didn't realize was also in the book. There's also some pretty important story/plot things that after reading up on it Michael Crichton had to change around because of the film industry wanting more books and to make more movies. Now I want to watch the movies again haha!
Fantastic annotation! The detail put into your appeals is wonderful! I like your comments about the secondary characters, it definitely made me chuckle. Everything else is spot on. I too read the book AFTER seeing the movie. I couldn't believe in the book version they kill off Malcolm! 5 out of 5 stars.
ReplyDeleteErin,
DeleteI know, right! It was so subtle too! Just one sentence could alter whether Malcolm lived or died in the book. I was so shocked/confused that after I finished reading that I had to investigate why he died in the book but they kept him alive in the movies. I found out that Crichton only agreed to write a second book if he could figure out a way to bring Malcolm back.